Viser innlegg med etiketten Cazals. Vis alle innlegg
Viser innlegg med etiketten Cazals. Vis alle innlegg

søndag 19. juli 2015

Spansk hvitvin bedre enn Le Montrachet ?

Fredag 28.5.2015 Stavern


Vi startet med et par velkomstviner:




Champagne La Chapelle du Clos Blanc de Blancs NV, Cazals
Are og Kim hadde med den samme champagnen ! Endel dosage. Den virker moden og drikkeklar allerede. Bra syre holder den opp på greit nivå. 87 poeng

DN.no: 
Innesluttet på duft med hint av epler og toast. Pen fersk og frisk frukt på smak med en spenstig syre og delikat frukt. Lang tørr og bitende utgang. 90 poeng





Testalonga El Bandido Cortez 2014, Swartland 
Blomster på nesa, Chenin Blanc syre, stram med endel fedme i munnen. Uharmonisk balanse og munnfølelse. Roar sa han drakk betydelig bedre og rimeligere hvitviner i Sør Afrika. Hvorfor kommer de ikke til Norge ? 85 poeng.

Fra BA;
Terningkast 5: 1959101 Testalonga El Bandito Cortez 2014, 11,5 prosent vol, Testalonga Wines, Swartland/Sør-Afrika, 75 cl, 284,90 kroner. Bestillingsutvalg. Strågul med vandig kant. Aromaer av gule, nypressede epler, sitrus og mineraler. Fersk eplefrukt i smak med god konsentrasjon og en tiltalende frisk syrlighet. Chenin Blanc kalles «Steen» i Sør-Afrika og er en drue som trives på dette kontinentet – langt fra hjemstedet i franske Loire. Til god sjømat.


White Wine of the Year 2015






Chablis Grand Cru Blanchot 1993, F. Raveneau
Gul og gylden, snev av sherry og avreven linoleum på nesa. Frisk og intakt munnfølelse med en imponerende lengde,  Nesa blir også bedre i glasset over tid. Eplecider, litt tynn i munnen og ingen tydelig og klar Chablis. En ikke helt optimal flaske. Som ofte med slike viner gjetter vi på Loire.
89 poeng.




TECHNICAL INFORMATION

WINEBLENDVINE AGESOIL TYPEVINEYARD AREA*
Les Clos Grand Cru
Chardonnay45 years averageKimmeridgian Limestone.50 ha
Blanchot Grand Cru
Chardonnay55 years averageKimmeridgian Limestone.64 ha
Valmur Grand Cru
Chardonnay40 years averageKimmeridgian Limestone.75 ha
Chablis 1er Cru
Vaillons
Chardonnay33 years averageKimmeridgian Limestone.40 ha
Chablis 1er Cru
Butteaux
Chardonnay45 years averageKimmeridgian Limestone1.49 ha
Chablis 1er Cru
Montée de Tonnerre
Chardonnay50 years averageKimmeridgian Limestone2.51 ha
Chablis 1er Cru
Forêt
Chardonnay15 years averageKimmeridgian Limestone.67 ha
Chablis 1er Cru
Monts-Mains
Chardonnay20 years averageKimmeridgian Limestone.36 ha
Chablis
Chardonnay9 years averageKimmeridgian Limestone.91 ha
* "ha" = hectares; one hectare equals roughly two and a half acres

VITICULTURE / VINIFICATION

• Harvested by hand
• Grapes pressed gently by pneumatic press
• Only indigenous yeasts are used
• Juice is left to settle, and then racked off its lees into cuve to ferment
• Alcoholic fermentation takes two weeks, followed by a malolactic fermentation in barrel
• Wines are aged for 18 months in older oak barrel and feuillette (most of which comes from barrel-maker Chassin), of which a very small percentage is new







Chardonnay Coleccion 125 Bianco 2006, Bodegas Chivite
Lett oksidasjon på nesa, kamskjell, marsipan, rik og aromatisk. Men en bra syre redder det hele. Møllkuler, noe botrytis og en annerledes og spennende hvitvin. Nedfallsepler, fat, intens og moden. Vinen holder seg bra og gjorde det overraskende godt mot høyverdige motstandere. Godt hjulpet av 95 poeng fra Kim !  Et godt kjøp til ca kr. 260,-. 92 poeng.





Le Montrachet Grand Cru 2007, Domaine Blain-Gagnard
Maiskolbe, mye eik, rik og konsentrert. Solid, virker fremdeles ung, spearmint, grønn og litt kledelig undermoden. Leflaive ? Særdeles elegant, kjølig frukt, tydelig mineralitet og jordsmonn, brent aske, lett plastikk, sykkelslange og talkum. En karakterfull og stor hvitvin. 94 poeng


Montrachet was recognized as a Grand Cru AOC in 1937, as was its neighbor Bâtard-Montrachet. The rules changed little that producers did not already have in place; yields, minimum alcohol (12%) and the grape variety (100% Chardonnay only) were regulated. Even before then, the limited production numbers and sheer outstanding brilliance of the wines had made Montrachets popular among those few people who could afford them. During the mid-20th century Montrachet cemented its reputation with a number of great Burgundian vintages.
Buying into a Montrachet plot of land was something that only the most wealthy and ambitious producers attempted. A Montrachet belonged in the cellar of every ambitious (or affleunt) wine collector. Certainly Montrachet never had a monopoly on dry white wine, but it's clear that into the 1970s no area could be considered clearly superior. Therefore it is a baffling error that no Montrachet was included in the 1976 Judgement of Paris. Instead, a Bâtard-Montrachet and Puligny-Montrachet Premier Cru were selected to represent the Montrachet wines. Certainly, Bâtard-Montrachet is one of the leading Burgundy Grand Crus, but then and now Montrachet is considered clearly superior.
As a result of Burgundy's loss to California in the Judgement, the prices and reputation of Montrachet were dragged down along with the rest of white Burgundies. And as with all white Burgundies, Montrachet producers took the opportunity to up the ante and improve the quality of their wine. Nowadays, many California fans continue to discredit Montrachet, but the many diehard fans still consider it to be the best place for dry white wine in the world.

Climate and Viticulture

Clearly, there are no inferior weather conditions on the Montrachet slope that contains no less than 5 Grand Cru vineyards. The weather is perfect, as is the concentration of limestone in the soil. Yields are low, and the whole slope is sheltered enough from wind to prevent the wine from getting unpleasantly lean or unripe. But what makes Montrachet the best of all the Montrachet Grand Crus?
This is a difficult question, and most likely its answer is more difficult than we might like it to be. But it is difficult to question the fact that Montrachet has the most perfect limestone slopes in the Montrachet areas. The Puligny-Montrachet and Chassagne-Montrachet Premiers Crus, as well as the village wines, are somewhat flat. Bâtard-Montrachet is sloped, but Montrachet has a very natural, even slope that lends character and elegance to the wine. Chevalier-Montrachet's slope is more acute, meaning that the wine is slightly more austere. The factor of slope is a simple viticultural phenomenon, and it's no coincidence that the richest and most elegant white wines are made on hills. And as it happens, Montrachet has the best slope in its area.

Grape Varieties

  • Chardonnay: Since it is not allowed to label red wine--from Pinot Noir or any other grape--as Montrachet, Chardonnay steals the spotlight as the main Montrachet varietal. In fact, Montrachet's white wine must be varietal Chardonnay, and blending is illegal. Therefore we have 100% Chardonnay wines that quite simply epitomize Burgundian Chardonnay. Many people argue that they are the best dry whites in the world, and history has certainly honored this position, but of course continuing challenges from California, New Zealand, South Africa, and numerous other areas has kept Montrachet's superiority a question mark. But within the Montrachet areas, which are themselves a large hub for reliably elegant, rich but dry, incredibly complex and refined wines, Montrachet is the undoubted leader. Chardonnay makes a generally fruitier wine here than it does in Bâtard-Montrachet, lacking the mineral edge that, to the inexperienced taster, can be construed as unpleasant. They exemplify purity, starting out with exotic fruit flavors, and on the palate having a saturating richness of butter and spice. Into the long finish, they remain completely dry. These are incredibly powerful wines, but they are never heavy, which is rare even in the Côte de Beaune. More impressively, they tend to age longer than any other dry Chardonnays; they will be more mellow but with the same impressive richness in 10 years, but will still be going at 20. At 25, they begin to fade, but even after that marker they will still offer great flavor and concentration.

Major Producers

Here is a list of the Montrachets that are generally considered to be world-class. This does not include certain very limited-production wines that are highly rated, but are almost impossible for anyone to obtain in the USA. A prime example of this is Domaine Leroy, whose very rare--although certainly excellent--wines are a true feat to find and purchase.
A note on price: $200 in Montrachet or Le Montrachet is almost suspiciously below-par. In fact, one should expect to pay at least $350 for an entry-level Montrachet, and $600 for a world-class bottle. More limited-production, "boutique" domaines such as Domaine de la Romanée-Conti will charge well into the thousands for a bottle, but these prices are based on collectibility more than actual quality. Here is a list of the 9 wines.
  • Bouchard Pere et Fils: Like five of the 9 wines on this list, Bouchard's Montrachet is made on the Chassagne-Montrachet side of the vineyard and is called Le Montrachet. As in many other Grands Crus, Bouchard proves that its size is no obstacle, and that in its case quality is very much consistent with quantity. Few bad vintages get in the way of Bouchard's very consistent Montrachet offerings. Many Bouchard vintages are explosively powerful in their youth, with a creamy richness powerfully backed up by pear, apple, and nut flavors. The exotic scents are sometimes too overpowering and have to be given time to mellow; since sometimes the Bouchard vintages are in a more backward style, 10 years of aging for any Bouchard Montrachet is probably a must. An exotically rich but totally dry wine, one of the classics of Montrachet, even if it must age in order to show its best side. New vintages are usually somewhere between $500 and $700.
  • Domaine du Comte Lafon: Lafon's Montrachet holdings also happen to be on the Chassagne side of the Grand Cru. These wines are extremely elegant with a richness of flavor that makes them approachable in their youth. But while having great refinement, they are also some of the most unabashedly aggressive white Burgundies. With the power-wine trademarks of deep, intense flavors, scents of smoke and oak, and a long, saturating finish, these wines have some of the most intense, concentrated character of any wine in Montrachet. They are sweet in their richness but deep and intense enough to never be cloying. It's unquestionable that this is one of the four best Montrachets, but on sheer power alone it's hard to see any other domaines that can rival it. Try 10-12 years of aging in order to get a more mellow--but surely still rich and powerful--wine, although early drinking would certainly be intriguing. This is definitely a boutique producer, and count yourself among the lucky if you are able to obtain a bottle from any vintage (excepting perhaps the subpar 2003) for under $1000. Indeed, some of the older bottles can range closer to $2000, and well above that when sold by private collectors.
  • Drouhin: Drouhin's rows of Chardonnay grapes, which lie in the Puligny-Montrachet part of the vineyard, are actually not holdings but are instead leased to them by the original owners, the Laguiche family. As a result, "Marquis de Laguiche" is appended after Montrachet on the label. These rows were always excellent, but in recent years the resulting wines have become more consistently stellar, now placing Drouhin very certainly on the list of Montrachet's top producers. These are some of the most exotic, wildly scented wines of Montrachet; nobody ever said these flavors lacked diversity, but new ones for this wine have been added such as quinine, violet, and sugar. It's a very sophisticated and complex wine, with few vintages in which it doesn't reach a burstingly rich, pleasantly sweet quality. They also have a long finish on which the creamy oak tendency shows through. These can age with the best of the Montrachets, but can be approached earlier on as well. Certain vintages are in the $350 range, but most of the time they are over $600.
  • Jadot: Some négociants have not made it into this list, but Jadot competes in the very small, competition-fraught area of Montrachet as well, with apparent success. This wine comes from the Chassagne side of the Grand Cru. It is some very intense wine when young, and although it can be drunk young for its explosive, aggressive nature, aging is necessary to let the flavors harmonize with the acidity and sheer power. With time, the flavors usually will mellow into a nutty, spicy richness with flavors of clove, almonds, and a number of exotic scents. This has to be aged for 8-10 years, but other than that it is in no way inferior to much more expensive Montrachets. As usual for Jadot, the prices are much less than those of other producers. In this case they usually are between $300 and $400 for new bottles.
  • Domaine Leflaive: Located in Puligny-Montrachet, Leflaive's holdings make very good Montrachets. Unlike many other Montrachets, they are dangerously austere in their youth and lack the explosive, exotically tinged richness that characterizes most Montrachets. Ideally they will pick this quality up after 5-10 years, since they certainly are deep and complex enough to make this a plausible development. They are incredibly sweet, and will become less lean with age to fill out into a great maturity. Even in the beginning, they have impressive aromas of stones, oak, and intense minerals. An unusual but still great Montrachet. It's a very collectible Montrachet, though, and much of what gets brought into America is snapped up immediately. Used prices have been known to exceed $2500.
  • Lucien Le Moine: There isn't much of this wine, and on production it becomes immediately collectible, but it's one of the best Montrachets. The rows, located on the Puligny-Montrachet side, yield wine of great complexity and richness, but there's greatly precise acidity to cut through the buttery sweetness. The 2005 was particularly lauded. This wine is sheer power, but also prides itself on its balance. The right compromise is apparently struck, and in 10 years the wine may become even more stellar. Unfortunately, it's pretty hard to obtain a new bottle of this wine.
  • Domaine Ramonet: Ramonet's vineyards are located in Chassagne-Montrachet. These are some of the most classy, but not necessarily expensive, wines of the Montrachet Grand Cru, showing Ramonet's typical commitment to a reasonable blend of powerful intensity and light elegance. There's a lot of power on the nose, palate, and finish, with flavors ranging from exotic peach and citrus to more Burgundian nut and smoky cream flavors. But description is largely irrelevant as the wines change with time to become even more refined and sophisticated. In short, this is a wine that makes the right compromise between power and elegance. In the best vintages they shouldn't be opened for 15 years or so later, but less impressive vintages can be opened early in order to appreciate their power and richness while it's still present. The wines range from $550 to $1200, and tend to settle in the $700 range. Older vintages, however, will probably run closer to $2000, especially if they are from classic Burgundy years such as 1990.
  • Domaine de la Romanée-Conti: Domaine de la Romanée-Conti, the most brilliant and expensive red wine producer in the Côte de Nuits and perhaps the world, has only one white wine holding. This is about a tenth of the Montrachet Grand Cru vineyard; all of this land is on the Puligny-Montrachet side of the vineyard. The same production value and low yields are applied in Montrachet as they are in the Côte de Nuits, and while not nearly as expensive, the resulting wines still lead the area in terms of price. These are amazingly powerful wines, made in the classic Montrachet style that the area has become known for. Ideally, they have a bit more depth and heaviness to make the flavors that much more impressive. Very masculine Montrachet in general, the wine has buttery aromas but also somewhat exotic notes of honey, clove, pineapple, and peach. A minerality is also present, although it's never intrusive. These wines are rich but, importantly, not at all sweet, so 10-15 years of bottle aging is wise. New vintages tend to be in between $2000 and $7000, but those interested in buying a bottle of Domaine de la Romanée-Conti probably don't care much about the price.
  • Domaine Sauzet: Sauzet has to be considered a leading producer in Montrachet as well as Bâtard-Montrachet; these heavy wines are quite impressive both young and when drunk with some bottle age. The Montrachet holdings are located entirely on the Chassagne-Montrachet side of the vineyard. They are highly textured, layered wines that are too intense to be drunk at a young age. But even in their closed, unapproachable nature they display a broad, layered complexity of exotic flowers and some minerals. In addition, the usual buttery vanilla notes of oak are noticeable. For powerful Montrachet it's pretty hard to beat this domaine, as the wines show a monstrous finish as well as great power on the palate. But yet they still have a great elegance. Hopefully, exotic fruits will come more into view with age, and the edge will fade away, making for a luscious mellow wine. One of these bottles should cost about $500 new.







Batard Montrachet Grand Cru 2004, Domaine Leflaive
Mere utviklet i stil enn forrige vin, men fremdeles limey, deilig og fresh i munnen. Smør, harpiks og kjølig. Svakt undermoden og relativt typisk for "årgangens" mineralske karakter. Lett eple, honning og marsipan. Endel kompleksitet, urtete med litt mye alkohol i finish kanskje ? Citrus. Kan lagres ytterligere. 94 poeng




                                               


Batard Montrachet Grand Cru 2008, Domaine Ramonet
Litt nøytral på nesa, mere elegant i munnen med "ramonesk grønske" og transparent tekstur. Yngst i rekka ? Lite utviklet og bør lagres, Vanskelig å vurdere nå. 94 poeng.




Corton Charlemagne Grand Cru 2005, Vincent Girardin
Litt støv i glasset, klassisk ung hvit burgunder, nesten montrachet-konsentrasjon her, veldig god balanse, skarp og presis syre med lang ettersmak. Krydret stil og pen munnfølelse. 94 poeng WHITE WINE OF THE YEAR 2015 !! (medtatt av Knut)




Corton Charlemagne Grand Cru 2007, Henri Boillot
Gulgrønn og transparent, rik og aromatisk. Moden frukt og endel alkohol i finish. Kraftig i uttrykket med fatkrydder, koriander og mister litt sjarmen over tid i glasset. Øyvind mente denne ikke var som den skulle. Som forsterkes av en svak oksidativ tone. Rar vin, også et lite snev av kork og sjø. Flere gjettet Chablis ! 92 poeng.



lørdag 10. januar 2015

Lunch Selosse

Lunch 25.10.14

Vi prøvde å få en smaking hos Anselme Selosse, men han arrangerer bare smaking en gang i uken. Derfor ble det kun (?) lunch på Les Avizes og det ble vel høydepunktet på turen ?






Vi startet med denne som en aperitif på terrassen:




Clos Cazal Blanc de Blancs Brut 2000
Frisk, kraftig og rik. Litt slankere enn 2002 som vi har hatt et par ganger tidligere i Vinklubben.
Beste Cazal vi har hatt, mente Are. 92 poeng



Champagne Jacques Selosse lieu dit "Le Bout du Clos" Ambonnay
Gylden, noe gul i fargen og annerledes kompleks. Utviklet med mandel, hvit burgund og Grand Cru følelse i munnen. Frisk, kraftig og rik. Stor munnfølelse med litt brent karamell, syltet lime og fløte. En kraftig og intens ettersmak i munnen. Men samtidig har champagnen et fantastisk løft og "høyde" i munnen. Roar var på 94 poeng, mens de andre var ekstatiske på 96-97 poeng.

In the fall of 2010, Anselme made big news when he announced that he'd be releasing a collection of six lieu-dit (single-vineyard) wines, each promising to be the definitive expression of a noble Champagne village.
His first step was to change the name of Contraste (his solera of Aÿ Pinot Noir) to "La Côte Faron," acknowledging its single-vineyard origins. Anselme also released "Les Carelles," a solera of 100% Chardonnay from the village of Le Mesnil.
Subsequently, Anselme will complete this collection with his 100% Pinot Noir cuvées "Sous le Mont" and "Le Bout du Clos"-from Mareuil and from Ambonnay, respectively. And for his 100% Chardonnay cuvées, Anselme will release "Les Chantereines" and "Chemin de Châlons" from Avize and from Cramant, respectively.


                                                     



Roses de Jeanne lieu-dit "La Bolorèe" 2009, Cedric Bouchard
Gogget i 2013. Øyvind mente denne skulle hamle opp med Selosse, men "no fat chance" !
Krutt, svovel og floral. Tydelig "rød" frukt selv om dette er 100% Pinot Blanc ! Nesten litt Dolcetto på nese. Rik munn og mangler litt eleganse. Mye dosage ? Rik i munnen og en veldig annerledes champagne. Så spesiell at Are mente det var en Prosecco ! Blek og kjedelig vs. Selosse. Tror nok den blir bedre ved lagring. 85 poengVal Vilaine kommer fra 1,49 hektar Pinot Noir fra landsbyen Polisy, plantet i 1974.

Fra 2012 gikk han fra Inflorescence over til å inkludere den inn i Roses de Jeanne line-upen. Avkastningen i vinmarken 
gikk fra 50hl/ha til 26hl/ha.
Flotte viner med litt variasjon - Fra bra til meget bra.
Den av hans viner som er mest easy access, rundere enn resten.

La Parcelle/ Côte de Béchalin kommer fra 0,73 hektar Pinot Noir fra Celles-sur-Ource.
Dette er strålende viner synes jeg.
Her kommer intensiteten skikkelig frem og med flott modnet fruktkvalitet synger det skikkelig.

Les Ursules kommer fra 0,9 hektar plantet med Pinot Noir fra Celles-sur-Ource . Vinmarken ligger rett i nærheten av kjelleren hans.
Disse også plantet i 1974.
Lenge siden jeg har smakt Ursules nå, men dette var supervalue med nydelige konsentrerte viner.

La Haute-Lemblé kommer fra 0,12 hektar plantet med Chardonnay fra Celles-sur-Ource .
Første årgangen (2004) ble det laget kun 600 flasker. Jeg vet ikke om produksjonen har økt, hvis ikke sitter jeg med 1% av 2008-årgangen. 
Har aldri smakt denne, men skal gi kraftige aromaer med tropiske innslag samt steinfrukter. Ulikt alt annet i Marne.

Le Creux d’Enfer er hans rose og kommer fra bittelille 0,07 hektar med Pinot Noir og Chardonnay plantet i 1994.
Fottråkket og skallkontakt for å trekke ut litt farge.
Heller ikke smakt, og er forferdelig vanskelig å få tak i.
Elegant, kompleks og går for å være en av de flotteste rose i hele Champagne.

Nesten alle av Bouchards vinmarker ligger på en blanding av kalk og leire, men han har en parsell som ligger på ren kalk.
Det er av denne han lager La Boloree. 0,21 hektar plantet med Pinot Blanc.
Dette er en av de mest intense og mineralske vinene jeg har smakt.
En energi som får hodet ditt til å riste!
2008 årgangen klokket jeg inn på 93p, som er litt feigt, et par poeng til hadde nok vært rettferdig.
Fantastisk vin!

Presle er siste tilskudd på stammen, tildligere skrevet:
Bouchard plantet 15 rader med Pinot Noir fra 10 forskjellige typer rotstokker i 2007.
De ligger i landsbyen Celles-sur-Ource. 
Selekterte vinstokker med tanke på lav avkastning og høy konsentrasjon.
Han satser på at et slikt mangfold vil bringe kompleksitet i vinen.
Han plantet så mye som 2500 planter på en kvart hektar, for å få plantene til å krangle om næringen og tvinge de til å bryte seg ned i det harde jordsmonnet av leire.
800 planter døde, men de som var igjen var meget sunne.
I utgangspunktet hadde han tenkt å lage rødvin av dette, men endte opp med Champagne. Godt valg spør du meg. :-.)
Han var inne på tanken med å lage en stille hvitvin også, men slo det fra seg i denne omgang.

Vinmarken ligger mot vest et godt stykke ned i skråningen, og produserer livlige, syrerike viner med Duracellkanin-energi! 

En av mine favorittprodusenter som (nesten) aldri skuffer.
Felles for alle vinene er null blends, alle er udoserte, flott fruktkvalitet med høy modning, energi, spenst og dybde på høyt nivå.
Kjøp blindt!






Voutte & Sorbèe "Blanc de Argile Extra Brut" 2009
Gogget 7.2.12. Litt mere strågul enn forrige champagne. Markjordbær og "Salon"-aktig slank i munnen. Enkelt fruktbilde med god og ivrig mousse. Holder seg godt i glasset. Mangler endel kompleksitet. Sitrusfrukter med innslag av rabarbra. Knut likte denne godt og ga den 93 poeng. 
Vi andre var på 92 poeng.



                                             

                                             

Champagne Jacques Selosse Millèsime 2002
Denne også litt gylden i fargen. Moden med mye kraft. Usikker på om dette skal lagres lenger, men hvorfor det, dette drikker uendelig godt nå ! Eple, litt oksidativt og utrolig elegant. Roar var på 97 poeng her. Vi andre var litt lavere. 96 poeng



                                                    


Champagne Jacques Selosse lieu dit "Les Carelles" 
Les Mesnil sur Oger
Kompleks og frisk. Igjen en utrolig god modningsgrad på druematerialet. Ørlite gul steinfrukt, presis med en fantastisk eleganse. Lang ettersmak med splash av zest fra citrus og appelsin. Igjen en veldig imponerende champagne fra Selosse. 95-96 poeng.

Fra winethomas:
One clear trend in Champagne is the introduction of more vineyard-designated wines. It is admittedly not a trend very much in evidence among the largest Champagne houses, and the number of bottles produced annually that carries a vineyard designation is not particularly large. However, the number of vineyard-designated wines are increasing, and several of the most highly regarded smaller producers are in this game, and Champagne geeks are definitely taking notice. A common French term for a specific vineyard and wines from such vineyards is lieu-dit, “named place”, with the plural formlieux-dits.
A small number of enthusiasts gathered in late April in Stockholm to taste a trio of vineyard-designated Champagnes from each of two producers: the quality-oriented and regularly improving smaller Champagne house Jacquesson and the cult producer of the cult producers, Jacques Selosse. The tasting, which had been brought together by people active at the Swedish online forum finewines.se, turned out to be just as spectacular as we expected, and very informative.
Jacquesson’s white Lieux-Dits trio was launched in 2011, with the 2002 vintage. Selosse started to release vineyard designated Lieux-Dits wines in 2010, when they were two. In 2011, they had become three, and the plan is for them to become six in due course. A peculiarity in the case of Selosse is that the wines are produced as a solera, similar to his Substance, but in difference from his Initial and Version Originale (V.O.). Since the soleras, which are characterized by continuous mixing of vintages in several steps – are still being built up, the wines still consist of only one or two vintages. Anselme Selosse’s idea is that by mixing vintages, the terroir will emerge more clearly. I will return to this idea below. Jacquesson’s wines are produced as “regular” vintage Champagnes but from a single vineyard, and they do see some oak.
All wines tasted were released in 2011 and were disgorged the same year. The vineyard wines were supplemented with one additional wine from each producer: a “regular” 2002 vintage Jacquesson and a Selosse V.O. disgorged in 2011. They were served in pairs in the order I present them below.
Jacquesson Millésime 2002
57% Pinot Noir (35% Dizy, 15% Aÿ, 7% Mareuil-sur-Aÿ) and 43% Chardonnay (36% Avize, 7% Chouilly). Disgorged 1st quarter 2011.
Bright yellow colour. In the nose yellow fruit, hint of herbal notes, some honey, citrus, initially a candy-like note of fruit essence that subsides somewhat after some time. After a while a certain smoke note, bread and brioche also appear. On the palate pronounced minerality with a “mineral water” impression, yellow fruit, high acidity, medium bodied. Still young. 89+ p.
I hadn’t tasted this wine before, but the two who had commented that it was better at this time than when released in autumn 2011, when it had come across as very strange. The nose is still a little funky, and the initial impression of candy/fruit essence gives a surprisingly “simple” impression, since Jacquesson’s other 2002s were very elegant and classically strict in style. The palate is more OK, but indicates that it could use more time.  At this time, I still consider it a bit of a weak effort, because I expect a good house like Jacquesson to do better in a top vintage like 2002!
Selosse Version Originale
100% Chardonnay from Avize, Cramant and Oger. Disgorgd 20 July 2011, probably with a base of 2002, 2003 and 2004.
Bright to golden yellow colour. A nose with clearly minerally smoke notes with some dust of crushed stones, discrete hint of mature yellow fruit with some exotic fruit, peach and papaya can be found, some honey and a hint of dried fruit. Powerful nose with well integrated oak notes, that is very reminiscent of a white Burgundy from Côte de Beaune. Pronounced minerality on the palate, powerful, spicy, rather high acidity, slight impression of salinity and bitterness, aftertaste with grapefruit. Young, would gain from some cellaring. 92+ p.
Classical Selosse style, but not at all the oxidative notes shown by the three Lieux-Dits, and definitely more “muted” (in a positive sense) nose than the 2002 Jacquesson. A bit more accessible and enjoyable already than I’d expected from a V.O. at 9 months after disgorgement.
Jacquesson Avize Champ Caïn 2002
100% Chardonnay. Disgorged 9 February 2011.
Bright yellow colour. A very brief first impression on the nose of dry road dust quickly dissipated. Nose of yellow fruit, pronounced minerality, some honey, a certain spiciness; rather powerful and elegant nose. On the palate pronounced minerality, quite high acidity, some citrus and apple, quite elegant. Young. 93+ p.
Produced in a quite firm, elegant and minerally style, it clearly outshines Jacquesson’s other vineyard blanc de blancs, Dizy Corne Bautray 2002, but is probably in need of more time to peak fully.
Despite the fact that Avize Champagne is supposed to represent a powerful and spicy style of Blanc de Blancs, this wine is much less foody or powerful than the V.O. Already here, the difference in producer style shows clearly; this Jacquesson is strict, elegant and mineral, but not excessively powerful, while the Selosse V.O. is much more similar to an oaked white Burgundy, also in possession of minerality and elegance, but with more of power and spiciness.
Oddly enough the vineyard Champ Caïn turns out to be located far down on the flatter land below the built-up areas of Avize, even on the other side of D9, with some non-vine crops as neighbours. I had expected that a vineyard selected for the production of a lieu-dit wine would be located in the slope above the village. However, the quality and style of the wine indicates that Jacquesson knows what they’re doing.
Selosse Les Carelles (from Le Mesnil-sur-Oger)
100% Chardonnay. Solera in build-up, with a base of 2003 and 2004. Disgorged 24 February 2011.
Golden yellow colour. Powerful nose of dried yellow fruit, some oxidation notes, quite spicy, minerality that grows with time in the glass. Reminds me of rum-soaked raisins, if made with white or golden raisins. Quite powerful nose but also with a certain elegance. The palate give a slighty sweetish impression on the attack, rather concentrated yellow fruit with some dried fruit, rather high acidity, pronounced spiciness, minerally mid-palate and on the finish. Rather ready to drink, but will surely be able to take long time in the cellar. 93 p.
Of the three Selosse Lieux-Dits wines released in 2011, I’d rate this in the middle.
The first pair of vineyard-designated wines, both Blanc de Blancs, could hardly have showed the difference in producer style more clearly. In comparison to V.O., this wine is much more of an extreme creation, with noticeable oxidative notes, in similarity to Selosse’s Substance. This means that the difference in style between Champ Caïn and Les Carelles is even larger than between Champ Caïn and V.O.
Jacquesson Dizy Corne Bautray 2002
100% Chardonnay. Disgorged 9 February 2011.
Bright yellow, relatively deep colour. Discretely fruity nose with mature citrus, mineral, a hint of flower. With time in the glass it develops more mature fruit and some smoke; elegant. Minerally attack on the palate, citrus, green apple, high acidity, impression of mineral water, a hint of bitterness. Young, but somewhat accessible. 91+ p.
A very good wine, and a clear step above Jacquesson Millésime 2002 in quality, but in comparison to the excellent Jacquesson Avize Champ Caïn 2002 it is somewhat weaker to me; Corne Bautray has a less minerally nose, and is more foody and comes across as slightly more “coarse” on the palate. Someone at the tasting considered it downright bad, but I would definitely go that far, and I also remember someone who held it higher than I did, on a relative scale between the wines.
By the way, Dizy is classified as premier cru (95% på échelle des crus), rather than grand cru as the villages where the other five vineyard-designated wines originate from. However, Dizy is the home village of Jacquesson, which explains why they produce wines from there.
Selosse Le Bout du Clos (from Ambonnay)
80% Pinot Noir and 20% Chardonnay. Solera in build-up, with a base of 2004. Disgorged 24 February 2011.
Golden yellow colour. Nose of mature red fruit, red apple, red berries, nectarines, some dried fruit, slight oxidation notes, discrete fudge notes, some rum-soaked raisins. Rather fresh attack, the palate shows obvious oxidative notes of cocoa powder, red berries and winter apples, good acidity (but not really high), spicy. Rather powerful, acidic and spicy aftertaste with a hint of bitterness. Definitely a food wine. Rather ready to enjoy, but gives a slightly disjointed impression that indicates that it could gain from some additional cellaring. 92 p.
Of the three Selosse Lieux-Dits wines released in 2011, I’d rate this in the third place.
Less mineral than Les Carelles, which is not too surprising. The varietal composition of Le Bout du Clos has previously been said to be 100% Pinot Noir (such as in Selosse’s price list), but it now seems to be confirmed that there is a coplantation of 20% Chardonnay in the vineyard.
Jacquesson Aÿ Vauzelle Terme 2002
100% Pinot Noir. Disgorged 9 February 2011.
Bright to golden yellow. In the nose ripe fruit, peach, ripe lemons, red apple, some perfume, discrete spiciness, mineral. Elegant nose. On the palate quite minerally with some salinity, ripe yellow and red apple, spiciness, high acidity, definitely elegant. Young. 94+ p.
Not obviously Aÿ-styled to me, I rather thought of a cooler Pinot Noir cru on Montagne de Reims, such as Verzenay, but this effect is produced by Jacquesson’s elegant, minerally style. To me, this is the best of Jacquesson’s three lieux dits of the 2002 vintage, as it slightly outshines even the excellent Avize Champ Caïn. Unfortunately – or perhaps predictably – this is produced in the smallest quantity of the three, from a measly 0,30 ha (0,75 acres).
Selosse La Côte Faron (från Aÿ)
100% Pinot Noir. Solera in build-up, with a base of 2003 and 2004. Disgorged 21 February 2011.
Golden yellow colour. Powerful nose of ripe fruit, ripe citrus, red apple, red berries, some cocoa powder, discrete notes of dried fruit and very light oxidation, some perfume, very elegant. On the palate a powerful, spicy attack, slightly oxidized (“winter apples”) yellow and red apples, peach, a hint of sweetness of fruit, honey and dried fruit, quite spicy. Fruity-minerally aftertaste with mild bitterness. Rather ready to enjoy, but could gain from further time in the cellar. 94 p.
A marvelous wine, and just as in the previous pairs, the difference in producer style is very obvious. I found this wine to outshine Le Bout du Clos rather clearly; of the three Selosse Lieux-Dits wines released in 2011, I rate this the highest. Curiously enough, I also found it to show the mildest oxidation notes of the three, and it had more pronounced acidity than Le Bout du Clos. This is contrary to what is expected, since Ambonnay is a slightly cooler village than Aÿ (it is situated higher up on the slope), which should give higher acidity. In addition, Le Bout du Clos is supposed to be straight 2004 (a high acidity vintage), while La Côte Faron is a blend of 2003 (an extremely hot year with low acidity) and 2004. Finally, La Côte Faron is Pinot Noir only, while Le Bout du Clos contains 20% Chardonnay. That’s three factors all pointing in the opposite direction from what I actually experienced the difference in the glass…
Also in the case of Selosse it seems that this wine, the best, is the one produced in the smallest quantity of the three Lieux-Dits. I found a second hand claim of only 600 bottles per year, while the other two were supposed to be 2000 and 3000 bottles per year!
Who won the duel?
I must say that the tasting was dominate by the great stylistic difference between  Jacquesson and Selosse rather than by quality difference. For both of them, the vineyard-designated wines were of very high quality. My verdict based on these wines is a draw, with the participants in this unique tasting the true winners. :-) If the first pair of wines is included, I’d have to name Selosse the winner, since the 2002 Jacquesson didn’t quite live up to the 2002 reputation, while the V.O. was of very high class, as usual.
Our collective scoring, where each of us voted for 1st, 2nd and 3rd place (corresponding to 3, 2 and 1 points) gave the following result:
1. Jacquesson Aÿ Vauzelle Terme, 16 p (three 1st place votes)
2. Selosse La Côte Faron, 16 p (two 1st place votes)
3. Selosse Les Carelles, 11 p
4. Jacquesson Avize Champ Caïn, 3 p
5. Selosse Le Bout du Clos, 2 p
It’s worth noting that two Aÿ wines, both 100% Pinot Noir, ended up in the first two places, despite the fact that several of the participants declared themselves to usually have a preference for blanc de blancs.
By the way, this was a “coordinated BYO tasting”, where you basically had to be able to contribute one of the bottles to be able to attend. Based on the fact that these wines are all very difficult to lay your hands on, one of the participants concluded that “you want to have contributed the worst” wine, since you now have one less bottle (or none at all) of that one in your cellar. :-)
Some final reflection on vineyard-designated Champagne
Vineyard designation on Champagne bottles is not something completely new, as Philipponnat’s Clos des Goisses and Krug’s Clos du Mesnil have been around for decads. Both Clos du Mesnil and Clos des Goisses are vineyard sites rather than cuvée names (Dom Pérignon, La Grande Dame, Cristal…) invented by the producer. My impression is that these early vineyard Champagnes were seen as a bit of odd creations since blending – the creation of cuvées – long has been seen as the core of the Champagne craft, and a way to guarantee the house style and an even quality. However, its is quite obvious that the new generation of small producers in Champagne too some extent look at Burgundy rather than the big houses in their own region for inspiration, and so to speak focus on the wine rather than the bubbles, the festive popping of corks, and the high marketing budget. In Burgundy, only the simpler wines are sold as Bourgogne rouge or Bourgogne blanc under the name of the producer and possibly a cuvée name. One example would be Cuvée des Jacobins from Jadot. In other cases you see village name or village name + vineyard name up to the premier cru level, and the vineyard name in splendid isolation for grand cru wines. This is obviously something that some champenois want to take after. Of course, in Champagne there is only an official classification at the village level (so all of Aÿ is grand cru, for example), while in Burgundy it is the vineyards that are classified.
But is it really the true “terroir” of the vineyard site that is felt in the respective wine? To me this tasting was a very clear demonstration of something that extreme “terroirists” prefer to be silent about: the great importance of winemaking (and the choices in handling of the vineyard). Through the entire tasting, what was most obvious was the enormous stylistic difference between the Jacquesson and the Selosse wines. A difference which I found stronger than both village and varietal character, and probably also vintage character. Rather I would say that these wines showed what you can expect from Champagne when a good producer makes a wine from a good vineyard: you get a really good wine that is clearly marked by the producer’s style, in addition to the grape varieties and its origin. You could of course say that the terroir played into this tasting in the way that the single premier cru wine, from Dizy, was a little weaker than those from grand cru villages, although I don’t really this there is much evidence that all vineyards in grand cru villages are better than those of premier cru villages.

The labels of Selosse’s Lieux-Dits wines. The name Jacques Selosse is written in larger print than the name of the vineyards. Perhaps that’s about the same proportions as those of the influence of terroir and winemaking on the finished wine? :-)
I’m also a litte doubtful about the idea that a solera is the best way of isolating the terroir character, since this method not only involves blending vintages and evening out the vintage character, but also includes a certain amount of oxidation. No, I don’t think there’s any reason to be afraid of some oxidative notes now and then, but I don’t think that oxidation will serve to reveal the “underlying character” of a wine. Rather oxidative notes could easily become dominant in themselves. In addition, different grape varieties will reasonably react differently to oxidation, since Chardonnay and Pinot Noir differ in levels of acidity, which includes an additional element not really related to the terroir in terms of the soil. So to some extent, the solera-produced wines of this tasting are much more “Selosse-specific” than they are “terroir-specific”. Not that that in any way is a qualitative complaint. :-)
Since all three Selosse wines were of different varietal composition, I already feel a strong urge to return to a comparative tasting when Selosse’s entire series of six vineyard-designated wines have been released. :-) Well see if I actually manage to lay my hands on the full set at some time, because that won’t be too easy. At that time, in any case, there will be three 100% Chardonnay wine from vineyard sites in three different villages, plus two 100% Pinot Noir and one 80%/20%. The three wines yet to be released come from Avize, Cramant and Mareuil-sur-Aÿ.
If you want to see Anselme Selosse himself talk about his vineyard-designated wines in French, there are two video clips below. One shorter from Selosse’s US importer with English subtitles:

One longer sans subtitling:

The Swedish version of this post can be found here.





                                                     

Roses de Jeanne In Florescence Les Parcelles 2009, 
Cedric Bouchard
Gogget i 2011. Fruktig og bedre i munnen enn "La Borolèe". Floral og litt petillante dvs. mindre mousse. Grønn karakter, snev av umodenhet og lite frukt. 88-91 poeng.