søndag 28. februar 2016

Barbera 2008 & 2009

Vinmøte Roar 12.2.16


Sandrone sier dette om årgangen 2008:

From the climatic point of view, 2008 took us back to the seventies with a very rainy spring and summer which made the management of the vineyards decidely difficult. Only thanks to the generous months of August, September and October were the grapes able to complete the ripening process in the best manner. The 2008 vintage undoubtedly rewarded the best zones and vineyard sites, and particularly those who invested in meticulous and timely vineyard management.


Og dette om 2009:

The 2009 vintage will be remembered for the unusually heavy winter snowfall.  Combined with a fairly wet early spring, this restored the ground water supply, which was low after several dry seasons.
After April 30 the weather returned to normal and the germination was uneventful and even, thanks to little rain in May and above-average temperatures.  The summer was characterized by low rainfall and periods of above-average heat. The vines had a regular linear development in all phenological aspects.


Good climatic conditions accompanied the end of the growing season and brought the grapes to optimum ripeness. The harvest began on September 29 and ended October 7.



Barbera d`Asti I Bricchi 2008, Scarpa
Furunål, rosmarin med lys utviklet kant. Blank sangioveseaktig frukt i en typisk frisk Scarpa stil. 88 poeng

Vi hadde denne også hos Are i mars 2015:

Barbera d `Asti i Bricci 2008, Scarpa
Mørkt og tett med bra balanse. Eldre tone enn de andre. Sursøt frukt, ganske varmt og rikt. Viser at Scarpa lager fortsatt bra viner. Denne har Scarpa syra, men årgangen demper produsentens stramme profil . 86-87 poeng.

Dn.no: 
Tre, og modne moreller med innslag av anis og tobakk på duft. Delikat og saftig, moden frukt på smak med en strukturert, kjølig og lang utgang med faste tanniner i finish. Drikk nå til 2020. Passer til lam og and. BDK. 89 poeng

Barbera d`Alba Gisep 2008, Massolino
Brettomyces, kumøkk, krydder og tenderer mot en Brunello i stil. Veldig tett og rik med mye smak. Mørk og det virker som den har sett endel fat. Vanskelig å vurdere da den ikke er så typeriktig. 87 poeng.

Barbera d`Alba Cascina Francia 2009, Giacomo Conterno
Moden med endel blåbær, morsom og rik vin. Men mangler eleganse og typisitet. Viser den intense stilen som barberaen til Giacomo har fått. 85 poeng

Vi hadde denne på vinmøte hos Roar også i september 2013:


Barbera d`Alba Cascina Francia 2009, Giacomo Conterno


Mørk og rå, fersk, tett og eika. Mye ekstraksjon og mangle eleganse. Litt grønt i nesa med rabarbra og piano-

polish. Reduktive toner med snev av gummi og varm alko-finish. En spesiell vin som virker mekka og vi er alle 

litt urolige for framtiden... 85 poeng.

Fra Dn.no


53414 Barbera d’Alba Cascina Francia 2009 Giacomo Conterno. Piemonte, Italia. Kroner 359,90, bestilling
90 poeng. Red & White 
Dufter av kirsebær, marsipan og mandler. Saftig, delikat og lekker på smak med lange tanniner og en pen fyldig frukt som skjuler syrestrukturen. Nå til 2018. Til and og svin.


Barbera d`Alba 2008, Bruno Giacosa (Falletto) 
Parfymert, frisk og sursøt. Den mest elegante og mest genuine barberaen i rekka. 90 poeng.

Vi hadde denne også hos Roar i september 2013:




Barbera d`Alba Falletto di Serralunga d`Alba 2008, Az A Falletto B. Giacosa


Medium farge og ingen overveldende Barbera nese. Frisk og god munnfølelse, endel mørk frukt, noe lukket og

mutt nå. Elegant vin med rødbærsfrukt , kjølig fokusert nese og meget god tannin kvalitet.Synes vel kanskje

Bruno lagde bedre Barbera før ? 89 poeng


Dn.no (2011):


49303 Barbera d’Alba Falletto di Serralunga d’Alba 2008 
Bruno Giacosa. Piemonte, Italia. Kroner 258,00 bestilling 
90 poeng. Gaia Wine & Spirits 
Importøren er tom for deres vanlige barbera fra Giacosa og her fått supplert et lite parti Barbera fra Falletto vinmarken i Serralunga. En klassisk, rakrygget, elegant og delikat barbera som er innsmigrende både i frukt og struktur som bare varer og varer. Kan nytes til vilt allerede nå, nydelig også til and og retter av kalv. Med slik vin blir det meste godt. Nå til 2015. OMA

Barbera d`Alba Scudetto 2009, G. Mascarello 
Mørk og jeg får en litt uelegant sørafrikansk assosiasjon i nesa. Varm, moderne og mangler presisjon. Solbær og blåbær. 86 poeng 


tirsdag 23. februar 2016

Den siste Corton Charlemagne


Vinmøte Roar 12.2.16


Champagne Brut Grand Millèsime 1996 Gosset
Calvados og nedfallsepler på nesa. Noe gylden, men frisk 96 stil. Anemisk og syrerik og utifra nesa kanskje en ikke helt optimal flaske. 88 poeng

Champagne Brut Clos de Goisses 1996, Phillipponat
Ikke så eplete, mere rik og kremet. Bra munnfølelse, blank i stilen. Kan fortsatt lagres. Men kanskje ikke spesielt typisk 1996. 92 poeng




Puligny Montrachet Le Ensegniers 2008, Domaine Ramonet
Lime og citrus med strøk av champignon. Chassagne Montrachet mente flere (som er bra gjetning siden det var en Ramonet) Grønnskjær, våt merinoull, litt spiss pt. og således litt typisk 2008. Noe uenighet mht. lagringsevne. Men en god vin var det. 90 poeng


Chablis Premier Cru Vaillons 2004, Vincent Dauvissat
Mere strågul og mineralsk. Saltaktig og steinete. Veldig chablis med sjø og tang i nesa. Men vi trodde dette var 2007/2008. En veldig god flaske, ikke antydning til premox. 90 poeng.


Puligny Montrachet Clavoillon 2008, Domaine Leflaive 
Snev av tobakk med citrus, pasjonsfrukt og leflaivsk fethet. Flere var oversjøisk på denne. (ikke meg :)) Spenstig det første kvarteret, etterhvert litt sliten i glasset. Men Leflaive er Leflaive. 91 poeng.


Puligny Montrachet Clavoillon 2010, Domaine Leflaive 
Brent eik, oozer av dyre fat, stor vin i munnen. Grand Cru ? Rik og konsentrert. Dypere og rikere, mere moden frukt. Mange fasetter, lag på lag. Lars Ivar sa at dette var en annen årgang av Leflaive`s Clavoillion ! 92 poeng.


Corton Charlemagne 1993, Bonneau du Martray  
Noe elde med våte ullsokker, lett bitter og tydelig sentralburgund. Fet og stor i munnen, samtidig deilig mineralsk og optimalt utviklet. Vinen holder seg veldig godt og vi har vel i Vinklubben nå drukket over 10 stk. Mye takket være Roar ! Dette var den siste årgangen som pappa lagde. 93 poeng

Fra Burgundy-report:


Charles the Great – also known as the Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne; Charles towered over his age – literally at a reputed six feet four inches – and certainly over his father, King Pepin the Short! Legend says that his wife ordered the planting of white grapes so that her husband could drink white wine instead of red, thereby avoiding the staining of his regal beard. Reputedly, that same vineyard is the piece of land that Charlemagne bequeathed to the Abbey of Saulieu in 775, a piece of land on the hill of Corton between Pernand-Vergelesses and Aloxe-Corton that still bears his name.
If the story about the white grapes is true, then the wife concerned could have been Desiderata daughter of King Desiderius of the Lombards. Charles married Desiderata, the second of his 5 wives, with the aim of forging a peace. Unfortunately for this liaison, Pope Adrian I intervened in 772 asking Charles for help against attacks by King Desiderius and his Lombards. Charles divorced his wife, invaded Italy, defeated his former father-in-law and added a new title to his growing list – King of the Lombards.
Winning so many battles and ruling over so many peoples, Charles had built himself an empire and was a defacto emperor. It was, however, Christmas Day 800 before he received the title officially. Charles was praying in Saint Peter’s Church in Rome when Pope Leo III arrived to place the crown upon his head – the Holy Roman Emperor at last.
The hill of Corton
Incredibly, Corton has known at least twelve centuries of cultivation. Unfortunately we know little of Charlemagne’s times & vines; particularly what inspired his followers to plant in this specific place, with this specific aspect – an aspect that 1,200 years later is considered one of the most gifted exposures in the world. What we do know, however, is that people became fully conscious of the characteristics of Corton-Charlemagne only much more recently – or at least that’s the story the lower prices the white wine used to fetch (vs the red) tells. It’s anyone’s guess what grapes made up the early plantings, it was not until some time well after the Revolution that the the Pinot Blanc and Gamay was ripped out, to be replaced with today’s mix of predominantly Chardonnay and some Pinot Noir.
The hill of Corton certainly looks like it should be the home of a grand cru, a large round hill crowned by the small wood of Corton. The hill is unusual in Burgundy, in that being round it has a multitude of exposures; whilst most of the Côte de Nuits and Côte de Beaune face South or South-East, the hill of Corton allows other exposures – facing West is where you will find the sub-climats of En Charlemagne and Le Charlemagne and precisely where you will find the vines of Domaine Bonneau du Martray. The Grand Cru vineyards are restricted to an altitude of roughly 320-370 meters, predominantly red at the bottom of the hill and whites at the top. There are actually 72 hectares allowed to use the Corton-Charlemagne name but in 1999 it was a little over 51 hectares in production.
The ground of Corton-Charlemagne is made up of three layers; a limestone base, a covering of white marl – more or less depending on the plot – and finally the most fragile part, the topsoil. Retaining this topsoil is one of the owners’ greatest challenges. You can see in the pictures (right) that at the bottom of the hill wooden planks often block the roadway-gaps in the old walls, hoping to catch any topsoil washed away by sudden rainstorms. You can also see that they have some success but I’m not sure how the different domaines ‘share’ this pile of fine-grained treasure!
corton-charlemagne – the wine
Personally I have no doubt that Corton-Charlemagne is one of the great white Burgundies. Whereas a Chevalier-Montrachet or even a Montrachet will start relatively elegantly in the mouth, their flavours building and building into crescendo of enjoyment – Corton-Charlemagne is different! A typical Corton-Charlemagne starts as the others would finish – with a punch – and slowly, slowly fades into the finish, that’s not to say they are not elegant but a Charlemagne likes you to know it’s arrived. I love to drink Charlemagne young, it’s the essence of Chardonnay but once it gets to 3 years old, leave it for another 10!
Versus the other white Grand Crus of the Côte de Beaune, Corton-Charlemagne is a relative bargain, normally half their price but often on a similar quality level. There are also other white wines from the hill of Corton that can carry a Grand Cru label, but to my taste they rarely offer what Charlemagne does – there can be the punch, but there is usually something missing – either the balancing acidity or the length of the finish.
We shouldn’t forget the red wines from Charlemagne; for sure, not the same reputation as elsewhere in Corton, too often lacking a little Grand Cru intensity and a little coarse in the tannin department but as you will read, that is a vision worth revisiting.
The history of the domaine bonneau du martray
the domaineThe seeds of the current Domaine Bonneau du Martray were sown at the sale of the confiscated church lands that followed the Revolution; the domaine effectively becoming only the third owners of ‘Charlemagne’ in a thousand years, after Charlemagne himself and the Church. The Revolution mostly failed to extend options for the peasantry – to them, only their bosses changed – it was mainly the second tier of aristocracy that avoided ‘the chop’, officers of the Army or rich merchant classes that could afford to bid at the auctions ‘biens nationaux’; so it was that the Bonneau-Véry family purchased lands that included the ‘Charlemagne’. The Bonneau family were incidentally direct descendants of a very famous Burgundian – Nicolas Rolin – investor of the Hospices de Beaune. In 1855 Dr Lavalle listed the Bonneau-Vérys as owning a whopping 19.7 hectares of Corton-Charlemagne. There was a family falling out in the early years, but one René Bonneau du Martray came to the fore to lead the domain. In 1892 Danguy & Aubertin (Les Grands Vins de Bourgogne) not only listed Bonneau du Martray as principle owners of Charlemagne in both Pernand and Aloxe, but interestingly ownership in a number of lieu dits in Volnay too; En Cailleret, Village de Volnay, La Gigotte and La Cave. Like many domaines, ownership of such lands in Burgundy usually entailed cost rather than profit so when lands passed down a generation, many were the times that people opted for the money rather than the land plus a tax bill, hence, the domaine’s smaller size today.
The recent history of the domaine starts with another René Bonneau du Martray (born 1886) that childless, passed on the estate to his niece, Comtesse Jean le Bault de la Morinière. Jean, husband of the Comtesse, took charge in 1969. It was Jean who extended the cellars and decided to domaine bottle, previously the wine went to the négociants. Following the untimely passing of the Comtesse, son Jean-Charles le Bault de la Morinière took over from his father Jean in 1994, returning from Paris where he worked as an architect.
the domaine today
The modern day Domaine of Bonneau du Martray covers just over 11 hectares, 9.5h of which are planted to Chardonnay for their Corton-Charlemagne, the Pinot Noir of the remainder is sited towards the bottom of their plot in the richer soil producing their ever-improving red Corton. Although these 11 hectares are contiguous they are bisected by the notional border between Pernand Vergelesses and Aloxe-Corton. They own the largest part of ‘En Charlemagne’, predominantly in the administrative domaine of Pernand (at one time they owned it all), and similarly ‘Le Charlemagne’ administered mainly by Aloxe. The buildings of the domaine are housed high up on of the steep streets of Pernand. It’s a small team, some of whom have been with the domaine for over 30 years; just seven people including the sons (Bernard & Jean-Pierre) of Henri Bruchon who was chief vigneron until retiring in 1994.
The domaine is well known as being one of only two that produce only Grand Crus, but given that the Domaine de la Romanée-Conti now produce the occasional Vosne-Romanée 1er Cru, perhaps they are now the only owners of that particular crown!
Jean-Charles has fantastic reminiscences; apparently as a small child his first word was neither Mama nor Papa but ‘helicopter!’ This was an interesting coincidence, as his father decided in 1993 to follow the lead of Petrus and use a helicopter to try and dry the vines; his neighbours gathered to watch, exclaiming – “C’est le Cinema!”. There were several ‘helicopter vintages’ that followed! Then there was the time that Jean-Charles took his life in his hands when discussing their red Corton with his father who was, after many disappointments, all for ripping out their Pinot Noir and replanting with Chardonnay. Jean-Charles casually suggesting that his father, just maybe, didn’t know how to make red wine! Fortunately for Jean-Charles, Jean Senior simply agreed and said maybe Jean-Charles should have a go…
the vineyard and it’s vines
Across all the vineyards the average vine age is 45 years. The Chardonnays are actually separated into 16 different parcels all of which are vinified separately. The highest parcels add the floral aspects to the wine, the middle parcels adding to the power and the lower parcels providing the sweetness. The 1970’s were a time of change, many of the vines were tired and required replacing. Jean had aquaintance to one Mr Raymond Bernard, a pioneer of clonal selection – this was the route he took for replacement. Jean-Charles when he started in the domaine decided to check the efficiency of these clones, not just by the quality of the cuvées, but investigating underground how good the root systems were. Whilst happy with these vines, he didn’t want to lose the diversity of a vineyard where many vines pre-dated clones so in recent times sélection massale has been used as the means of replacement. Jean-Charles is convinced that vines gradually mutate to fit their location; to amplify his assertion he points to the vines of Anne-Claude Leflaive and Dominique Lafon – also chardonnay – but their grapes and vines look quite different to those of his grown in Corton. This observation leads him to consider his vineyard an ‘entity’.
Jean-Charles points to the times after the war when first, horses were replaced with tractors, and second because the ground became more and more compacted, a dependancy on chemical treatments grew and grew. He says that it was precisely this that made the soil more and more fragile, despite being farmers, there was a generation that forgot to look after the soil which bore them their fruit. Today there are no herbicides or fertilisers allowed in or on the domaine’s vineyards.
The Wines
corton-charlieJean-Charles practices lees stirring for his whites, he feels it adds an extra complexity, he also eschews new oak, using just enough for the effect he requires – typically around 30%. The Charlemagne has a very good reputation – and it’s no surprise – for it’s quality level it is something of a Burgundian bargain. It tastes fantastic young and old, and shows super complexity. Personally I’ll try to avoid drinking it (at least my own bottles!) at an intermediate age. The red wine is different; criticized in some quarters for many years, Jean-Charles has worked very hard to make a difference: Yields are restricted by green harvesting to an average of 30 hl/ha. There is complete destemming and a period of cold soaking prior to fermentation. I think the wine still shows it’s chalky base, but the tannins are today very svelte and the concentration is exactly where it should be. Jean-Charles suggests that blind, you would never place this wine as a Corton – I’m not sure, it reminds me very much of Belland’s Corton Clos de la Vigne au Saint – but I know what he means, and it’s a very interesting wine though relatively expensive in it’s genre vs the Charlemagne.
The domaine by virtue of it’s large holdings does what many cannot – it cellars a lot of older vintages. Don’t dismiss the occasional 1991 or 1993 on the shelf of your local merchant – it could have come direct from those cellars very recently – always check as the domaine often releases older vintages!

tirsdag 16. februar 2016

Nuits-Saint-Georges Les Chaignots 2012, Domaine Robert Chevillon

Pans vei 16.2.16


Nuits-Saint-Georges Les Chaignots 2012, Robert Chevillon
Den første halvtimen viser den sjarm i en åpen og generøs profil med røde friske bær. Sådan en ganske opulent og typisk Chevillon stil som er god å drikke f.eks. på restaurant uten å følge den akademisk hele kvelden. Etter halvtimen strammer den seg inn, blir litt grovere med tanniner og mørkere bær. Det er nå jeg tror årgangen skiller seg fra 2013. 2012 blir litt "muted" og lukket og den kommuniserer tydelig "la meg ligge". Tydelig Vosne-slektskap med sin beliggenhet nord i NSG. Litt uharmonisk i munnen etter 1 t. Blir spennende å teste vs. 2013. Som jeg tror drikker bedre nå. 91 poeng. 


Fra Burgundy-report
Aux Chaignots
Is a decent sized 5.86 hectare east facing vineyard at an altitude of 260-280 metres. Here there’s more gravel and ‘alluvial wash’ in the soil, though the base remains the pink Premeaux limestone. We really do have an embarrassment of riches when it comes to producers; Faiveley, Alain Michelot, Chevillon, Gouges and Gerard Mugneret. But if I had to choose just one, I’d be very happy with the wine of Dr Georges Mugneret-Gibourg…

torsdag 4. februar 2016

US Cab smaking på Stock 2.2.16 del 2 Montelena Estate


Montelena Estate Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley 1995; "floral, litt bretty, blåbær og en ikke helt optimal flaske, har mistet lillaskjæret ,svett , bordeaux-aktig, krydret og aromatisk. Overraskende sliten hvis man sammenligner med f.esk. en rød Bordeaux 1995. 85 poeng"

Montelena Estate Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley 1998; " mere trøkk i munnen enn 95, mørkere frukt, litt "off" duft, snev av svidd gummi & mørke aromaer, bløt i strukturen. Frisk og kan fremdeles lagres. 88 poeng"


 Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley 2008, Montelena ; " varm stil, mye eik, endel støv i glasset, solbær, en rik og fullmoden årgang, litt vanskelige utenpåliggende grønne tanniner, dyp lilla. Snev av fløtekarameller. 87 poeng" 

Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley/Calistoga 2010, Montelena ; " et mere elegant uttrykk, snill med et noe grønt og undermodent preg. Enklere, men det kan være positivt mht. US Cab. 86 poeng"



Fra the wine cellar insider:

Chateau Montelena Napa Valley California Cabernet SauvignonChardonnay wine producer profile, wine tasting notes, with a history of the property, plus information on their wine making techniques and their soil, along with wine reviews and links.
If you like, you can immediately jump to the Tasting Notes for this Winery
Chateau Montelena has a long history dating back to 1882. That was the year when Alfred L. Tubbs purchased 254 acres of land in the Calistoga appellation of the Napa valley. Tubbs set to work planting the vines for the purpose of creating his American version of a French chateau that would be right at home in the Bordeaux. Alfred Tubbs was so enamored with French wine, he hired a French wine maker and brought him to America to help produce Chateau Montelena wines.
Montelena became tremendously popular. With its new found fame and wealth, the estate continued expanding until it became the 7th largest winery in Napa by the start of the 20th century. Things continued improving until Prohibition caused all wine making and consumption in America to grind to a halt. Once the Volstead act was repealed, it took decades for the California wine industry to get back on track.  In 1958, the heirs of the Tubbs family sold the winery to Yort and Jeanie Frank. Alfred Tubbs will always be remembered in Calistoga. The street where Chateau Montelena is located on is now called Tubbs street. After buying Montelena, the Frank family created the stunning picturesque grounds and gardens that occupy Montelena today.
Chateau Montelena was purchased by Jim Barret and Lee Paschich in 1969. The initial vintages were made from purchased fruit, bought from other growers in the area. 1978 was the debut vintage for Chateau Montelena using estate grown grapes to make the wine. The reason for the decade long delay before making wine from their own vineyards was due to that the vines needed to ripped out and the vineyards replanted. In 1969, much of the estate was planted to Carignane, Alicante and other varietals that the new owners were not interested in producing. Their goal was to produce great California Sauvignon and Chardonnay. The next move for Montelena was to hire Mike Grgich as their winemaker. Mike Grgich later went on to found his own, self named winery.


Montelena2 300x168 Chateau Montelena Napa Valley California Wine Cabernet Sauvignon Chardonnay
Chateau Montelena
Chateau Montelena had become immensely popular by the middle of the 1970’s. But what really made the wines and the reputation of Montelena famous all over the world was the results of a blind wine tasting held in Paris in June, 1976. The event was billed as The Judgment of Paris. At the tasting, Chateau Montelena and other wines, including some of the top Bordeaux wines of the day were pitted against each other in a blind tasting. The nine tasters picked to judge the tasting were well-known and established in the wine industry. During the competition, the judges were asked to blind taste 4 white Burgundies against various California Chardonnay’s, California Pinot Noir wines were paired against red Grand Cru Burgundy and Bordeaux wine was arranged to be tasted next to California Cabernet Sauvignon.
Prior to the tasting, which received an extraordinary amount of publicity in the pre-Internet days, many people were willing to bet money that the French wines would easily triumph. Comments heard around the table during the event quoted the judges as saying: “Ah, back to France!” exclaimed one judge sipping a 1972 Napa Chardonnay.  “That is definitely California. It has no nose,” said another judge after tasting a Batard Montrachet.  After the ballots were cast and later revealed, the red wines with the highest scores were Stag’s Leap Wine Cellars’ ’72 from the Napa Valley, followed by Mouton-Rothschild ’70, Haut-Brion ’70 and Montrose ’70. The four winning whites were, in order, 1973 Chateau Montelena, 1973 Meursault-Charmes and two other Californians, 1974 Chalone from Monterey County and Napa’s 1973 Spring Mountain.  At the time, Jim Barrett, the general manager of Montelena stated, “Not bad for kids from the sticks.” The success of Montelena is owed to Jim Barret. His efforts, along with Bo Barret, his sons work help keep Montelena on solid ground. By 1982, Bo Barret, the son of Jim Barret took over as wine maker for Montelena.
By the start of the new millennium, Montelena experienced problems with several vintages due to their cellars, which had become infested with TCA. This caused wide rifts between critics, Montelena and consumers as each voiced their opinion. By 2004, Montelena began to acknowledge the TCA problems, which were eventually solved.
In July, 2008, a deal was struck to sell Chateau Montelena to Chateau Cos d’Estournel from Bordeaux. At some point, the relationship between the Barret family, the owners of Montelena and Michel Reybier became contentious and the deal fell apart. A law suit was filed and Montelena eventually won a judgment. Jim Barrett passed away, March 15, 2013 at the age of 86. Aside from his work in creating the modern era for Chateau Montelena, Jim Barrett remains known for his term as President of the Napa Valley Vintners, his service on the board of governors of Thomas Aquinas College in Santa Paula and his efforts with Family Wine Makers. Jim Barrett remained dedicated to his Irish roots as a loyal member of the “Irish Order of the Wine Geese,” a wine group focused on the Irish connection to the wine industry at large.
Traditional in style, the wine of Chateau Montelena Cabernet Sauvignon is fermented in stainless steel at warm temperatures. Malolactic fermentation takes place in large 1,200 gallon casks. The wine is aged in 20% to 25% new oak for up to 22 months. The barrels are stored in a series of tunnels and caves beneath the chateau and winery. In August 2013, at the ripe old age of 130 years old, Chateau Montelena was officially recognized by the American National Register of Historic Places.
Montelena produces Montelena Estate Cabernet, Napa Valley Chardonnay,  Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon, Zinfandel and Riesling. While Montelena produces wine from a myriad of varietals, the estate is primarily known for their Cabernet Sauvignon. With close to 121 acres under vine, the average annual production for Montelena is close to 50,000 cases of wine per vintage.


Fra Decanter:
In March 2013 James L Barrett, the founder of Napa Valley’s Chateau Montelena, died at the age of 86. His son Bo, who has been the winemaker since 1982 and is now CEO, talked to Courtney Humiston for Decanter.com over the course of two lengthy interviews, once in December 2012 and one shortly after his father’s death, about founding the historic property, the evolving style of California Chardonnay – and the professional and family tensions that nearly led to Montelena being sold to Cos d’Estournel.
What were those first years like at Chateau Montelena?
We got here in 1972 and the vineyard had been reunited with the Chateau but the Chateau had been abandoned since 1939. We had to buy everything. There were no tanks, no barrels; it was a dirt floor. We had to build the first modern winery in 1972 and we had to replant everything.
The vines had been neglected and were rundown. In the 1930s they grew stuff they could ship to the East Coast and then they grew stuff the co-ops wanted to sell to Gallo. It was the age of industrial winemaking, and the estate was planted to heavy-bodied blending grapes like Alicante Bouschet, Petite Sirah, Grenache, Carignan. Here they were not really high-quality grapes, they were just for bulk wine. So we bought in Chardonnay and Riesling, and then we started planting Cabernet Sauvignon.
What do you think is your father’s most important legacy?
That he was best at was helping people grow. He was a tough guy but a nurturing boss. He was a fearless leader of the team of Chateau Montelena. He was a good organizer and a good leader—he taught me to do things bigger than myself.

For example writing the petition for Calistoga to be an official sub-AVA of Napa Valley? 

He let me run with that. We didn’t really need it but it was important for our neighbours—they needed a commune. It was an extension of what he was doing with the Napa Valley Vintners, the Family Winemakers [Jim Barrett was president of both], affordable housing, you name it. I’ve always been brainwashed by my dad into this leadership role. Because of the Paris Tasting, We’ve always had a little bit of a leadership role in our Calistoga AVA and by extension Napa.
And yet your family wasn’t really a farming or winemaking family?
Our exposure to wine is not multi-generational. My father learned about wine because his clients started taking him to dinner in LA once he became successful, and he learned about wine at an extension class at UCLA – and in 1970, of course, the only wines they taught at UCLA were European. So they looked at Riesling from the Rheingau , then they looked at White Burgundy and Red Burgundy then they looked at Cabernet, which was Bordeaux. When he came up with the idea of starting a wine company he wanted to make a white Burgundy because that was the best white wine out of Europe he had been exposed to and of course the best red wine was Cabernet. And because Calistoga was a warmer area [than Burgundy or Germany] he set out to make a Bordeaux first growth here in Calistoga.
My dad wasn’t really a farmer or an agronomist; he was a team builder. He hired the right people and let them do their job.
One of those people was Mike Grgich, the winemaker who made the 1973 Montelena Chardonnay. A lot is made of the Paris Tasting—is it really as important as we think?
That was played up louder than it ever was. We just wanted to get in the same league…to be allowed on the field. And now we are. And by extension, if the Californians can do it, then the Aussies can do it and the Kiwis or whoever.
Would the California wine industry be where it is if it weren’t for the Paris Tasting? 
Probably. It was how Napa Valley came to lead the fine wine revolution of the United States. Would it have happened by itself? Probably, because the weather is just too good here.
Would it have happened instantly like it did in 1976? No. It probably would have taken another 20 years.
In the history of the Chateau Montelena, it was a pivotal moment because it allowed us to get the Cabernet planted. My dad’s dream was to make a Bordeaux first growth and the success of the Chardonnay allowed us to do that.
In 2008, you very nearly sold Chateau Montelena to a French company. What was happening at that time? 
In 2008 I became the master winemaker and I had to do a lot more of my dad’s job. I was running the outfit, but my dad was still very much in charge.
I only owned a tiny fraction—I still do— and my siblings weren’t involved. What happened in 2008 was for safe planning purposes. They [the Reybier family of St Estephe 2nd Growth Cos d’Estournel] offered me a pile of money [reported on Decanter.com as in the region of US$110m].
We are happy the deal fell through. It allowed my father to let go and for me to build a new team. We needed a new cellar. We were asking him to plant a new vineyard. That’s a lot to ask of an 80-year-old man.


What has changed since that almost-sale? 
It was the best thing that could have happened. The last years have been so much fun. We’ve been replanting, and building [a major renovation of the cellar was finished in 2011]. My dad’s been looking forward, not back. We ran as a monarchy and since then we have been running as a solid republic.
The other thing that Chateau Montelena is closely associated with — and which happened in the same year — is the movie Bottle Shock. How influential has that movie been? 
We are at the [north] end of Napa Valley—we are the last winery you get to. Which means that through 2008 people who came here were already familiar with the wines. The only visitors we had were experienced and wine-sophisticated. Bottle Shock introduced us to people who had never visited a winery before. ‘Hey, I’m from Iowa and I want to check this out.’ We had to change our parking lot.
Being a celebrity, being recognised, takes some getting used to. I’m a pretty private guy. The cult of the winemaker was started by Robert Mondavi as early as the 1960s and 70s—being recognised as a star winemaker. I think what helps me is my wife Heidi [Barrett, the renowned California consultant] is even more recognisable for her own accomplishments. I think most of my recognition is still from my work.
How has the style of Chardonnay changed since 1973? 
This is a classic house. We haven’t gone from my father’s original vision which is traditional styling with California flavours. By ‘traditional’ I mean the European style – which has basically higher acid. All of our wines have a European model that they emulate. People are getting into this whole terroir business but we were doing that a long time ago: we just didn’t have a name for it.
Was it difficult not to be making the big, fruit-forward style of California Chardonnay that was so wildly popular for so long? 
For a long time we were paddling uphill. Our wine was hard to sell because everyone was drinking the soft style. But we knew it was the right thing to do in the long run because it was such a good wine. The reason it won the Paris Tasting is because it worked. It’s supposed to taste like a white Burgundy and it still does.
We are really pretty stubborn. When the soft Chardonnay style was invented around 1982, it really took off with the Kendall-Jackson style. They did the malolactic, got a lot of wood in there and a lot of sugar too. We stuck to our guns and made this style of Chardonnay, the tart, lean, crisp – and ageable – style.
Is the average American coming around to the Chateau Montelena style?
The tide has definitely turned. We did some of the more modern Burgundian stuff like whole cluster presses and so on. We thought, we’re going to stick to our guns philosophically, but improve our fruit handling to make our wine even better. And that worked spectacularly. By the time the Chardonnay drinkers matured enough to start looking for this kind of style we had the right wine. The wines we make now are actually superior to the wines we made in 1973.
So the stylistic pendulum is swinging back?
Yes. And the main reason is that Chardonnay is pretty tasty. Chardonnay for a long time had a dreary sameness. Everyone was using the same oak, the same malolactic culture, the same yeast. All you really have are the grapes to differentiate the great wines from the standard wines.

Read more at http://www.decanter.com/interviews/interview-bo-barrett-of-chateau-montelena-20175/#plfPCCIRuRDg1y54.99

US Cab smaking på Stock 2.2.16 del 1 - Champis, port & hvit




Vi startet med en Roualet-Crochet champagne fra 1967;  "rik, endel dosage i munnen, lagret på eikefat (?), høy modning med bittert appelsinskall i finish. Lite mousse, mere hvitvin enn champagne. mangler spenst og presisjon. Men en grei champagne fra et dårlig champagneår. 89 poeng"  

Vinklubben Kåte Rhoner kom over denne champagnen på restauranten Hostellerie La Briquterie

http://vinerd.blogspot.no/2014/12/helga-natt.html             

Produsenten holder til i landsbyen Champillon, landsby 5 min nord for Epernay mot Reims.

2 blinde viner medtatt fra Tom H:

Chablis 1cru Beauroy 2014 fra Philippe Pacalet "moden, rocka og opulent lite typisk chablis, endel tropisk og mangler eleganse. Moderne og drikker godt allerede. Vitaplex og Sanasol, lav syre, åpen og ekspressiv. Overraskende fremoverlent allerede. 85 poeng"

Chablis Sechet 2014 fra V. Dauvissat "stum, utvikler seg seint i glasset og også denne var vanskelig å ta som en Chablis. Endel steinmineraler på nesa, kalkaktig og en god konsentrasjon med whiff av kaffe. Bør lagres. Og bør kjøpes. 91 poeng"

Medtatt fra Børge:

Port 1966, Taylor "korket, strippet for frukt med markert alkohol. Ikke alle var enig. NR" 

Husvin på Stock:

Chardonnay 2014, Au Bon Climat "tropisk nese, roer seg litt i glasset og tenderer mot en mineralsk finish. Mangler endel frukt. 84 poeng"